Paparazzi Jewelry Lawsuit 2025

Paparazzi Jewelry Lawsuit 2025. Paparazzi Accessories Prehistoric Passion Silver Paparazzi Accessories Paparazzi deceptively and misleadingly represented that its jewelry products are "lead-free and nickel-free," a new class action lawsuit alleges Multilevel marketing (MLM) company Paparazzi Accessories, known for its $5 fashion jewelry, has agreed to a $1.9 million settlement following accusations of operating a pyramid scheme.

Paparazzi Accessories Classic Candescence Copper Paparazzi Accessories
Paparazzi Accessories Classic Candescence Copper Paparazzi Accessories from paparazziaccessories.com

Attorney General Nick Brown announced that 7,100 Washington residents who sold jewelry for Paparazzi will soon receive checks averaging $180. The settlement follows an investigation by the Washington State Attorney General's Office, which concluded that the Utah-based company had engaged in unlawful business practices.

Paparazzi Accessories Classic Candescence Copper Paparazzi Accessories

By signing the consent decree, Paparazzi heads off an action from the AG's office, which alleged the company was in violation. Utah-based jewelry company Paparazzi has agreed to pay $1.9 million and reform its business practices in connection with an alleged pyramid scheme Paparazzi Toxic Heavy Metals Jewelry Class Action Lawsuit Overview: Who: The class action lawsuit was filed by Tamie Hollins against Paparazzi, LLC

Sarah's 5 Paparazzi Jewelry & Accessory Party. Paparazzi Accessories, a multilevel marketing (MLM) company specializing in jewelry, has agreed to pay $1.9 million and change its business practices in Washington state, according to a statement from the office of Washington attorney general Nick Brown (pictured). Why: Hollins claims that Paparazzi has been deceptively and misleadingly representing its jewelry products as "lead-free and nickel-free," when in reality, they contain detectable levels of these toxic heavy metals.

Paparazzi Accessories Best Decision Ever Red Paparazzi Accessories. The settlement follows an investigation by the Washington State Attorney General's Office, which concluded that the Utah-based company had engaged in unlawful business practices. The settlement follows allegations that the company operated as a pyramid scheme, violating Washington's Consumer Protection Act and Antipyramid Promotional Scheme Act.